MetroFocus

METROFOCUS: April 7, 2021
Tonight, doctor Daniel Griffin, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University and the Chief of the Division of Infectious Disease at Prohealth New York answers commonly asked questions about the vaccine.
TRANSCRIPT
>>> THIS IS "METROFOCUS" WITH
RAFAEL PI ROMAN, JACK FORD AND
JENA FLANNIGAN.
"METROFOCUS" IS MADE POSSIBLE BY
SUE AND EDGAR WACHENHEIM III.
SILVIA A. AND SIMON B.VOITA
ENDOWMENT TO FIND ANTI-SEMITISM.
THE JOAN GAN SOONY FUND, BERNARD
AND DENISE SCHWARTZ, BARBARA
HOPE ZUCKERBERG AND THE AMBER
MONELL FOUNDATION AND BY JANET
PRINDEL SIDE LER AND JODI
ARNHOLD, AND JUDY AND JOSH
WESTIN, DR. ROBERT C. AND TINA
STONE FOUNDATION.
♪
♪
>>> GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO
"METRO FOCUS."
I'M JACK FORD.
BEGINNING THIS WEEK, NEW YORKERS
16 AND OLDER ARE ELIGIBLE FOR
THE COVID VACCINE.
RIGHT NOW OFFICIALS SAY THE
STATE HAS ADMINISTERED 10
MILLION DOSES AND ONE-THIRD OF
NEW YORKERS HAVE RECEIVED AT
LEAST ONE DOSE MARKING ANOTHER
MILESTONE IN THE BATTLE AGAINST
THE CORONAVIRUS.
NATIONWIDE, PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS
CALLED FOR ALL STATES TO OPEN IT
UP TO ALL ADULTS TO APRIL 19th.
THE GROWING ELIGIBILITY LIST
COMES AS OUR REGION BATTLES THE
CONTAGIOUS VARIANTS AND A
POSSIBLE NEW WAVE, NEW YORK, NEW
JERSEY, CONNECTICUT ALL HAVE
SOME OF THE HIGHEST INFECTION
RATES RIGHT NOW IN THE COUNTRY.
SO WHERE ARE WE IN THIS RACE
BETWEEN GETTING MORE PEOPLE
VACCIN
VACCINATED AND A POSSIBLE NEW
WAVE?
HOW LONG WILL THE PROTECTION
LAST?
CAN IT OFFER RELIEF TO COVID
LONG HAULERS?
AND WHEN CAN WE EXPECT TO REACH
HERD IMMUNITY?
JOINING US NOW TO HELP US ANSWER
THOSE AS WELL AS SOME OF THE
MOST COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS
ABOUT THE VACCINE, WE ARE
DELIGHTED TO HAVE DR. DANIEL
GRIFFIN, AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE
SPECIALIST AND ALSO THE CHIEF OF
THE DIVISION OF INFECTIOUS
DISEASES AT PRO-HEALTH NEW YORK.
WELCOME TO YOU.
THANKS FOR JOINING US.
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
HAPPY TO BE HERE THIS MORNING.
>> LET'S GO THROUGH A WHOLE LIST
AND WE'LL TURN THIS INTO A
MASTER CLASS, IF YOU WILL, ON
WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW.
LET'S START WITH THE VACCINE
WHICH IS THE LOGICAL WAY TO
START.
WE'LL S.T.A.R.TART WITH MODERNA
PFIZER, JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND WE
TALKED ABOUT THE TESTING PROCESS
AND WHAT ARE WE LEARNING NOW IN
TERMS OF HOW EFFECTIVE THEY HAVE
BEEN IN REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE?
>> YEAH.
NO, I THINK THIS IS A GREAT
PLACE TO START.
WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE
STARTING WITH THE TOOLS THAT
WILL BE ENDING THIS PANDEMIC AND
WE HAD SOME PRETTY IMPRESSIVE --
I MEAN, IMPRESSIVE TO THE POINT
OF STARTLING, IMPRESSIVE RESULTS
FROM THE TRIALS.
WHEN THE FIRST DATA CAME OUT,
PFIZER, PREVENTING 95%, AND 94%
PREVENTING SYMPTOMATIC AND IN
THE TRIALS 100% AT PREVENTING
DEATH AND HOSPITALIZATION.
REALLY, I THINK PEOPLE ARE BLOWN
AWAY.
WE DID NOT EXPECT RESULTS THAT
GOOD AND THEN J & J CAME OUT AND
J&J, AND THE ADVANTAGE WAS ONE
SHOT.
THEY WERE LOOKING REALLY EARLY,
14 DAYS AND 28 DAYS AFTER THE
FIRST SHOT AND THEN I LIKE TO
SAY OUT THERE IN THE REAL WORLD,
VARIANTS, HIGH TRANSMISSION
RATES STILL 100% KEEPING PEOPLE
FROM DYING, 100% KEEPING PEOPLE
OUT OF THE HOSPITAL IN THESE
TRIALS AND SHOWING TREMENDOUS
EFFICACY AT KEEPING PEOPLE FROM
THE DISEASE.
THOSE ARE THE STUDIES AND THEN
COMES HOW WELL IS IT WORKING IN
THE REAL WORLD AND THAT'S THE
BIG QUESTION EVERYONE WANTS TO
KNOW, AND WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY
SEEING IS WE'RE SEEING THIS
TREMENDOUS LEVEL OF EFFICACY
EVEN IN REAL WORLD SITUATIONS.
I'LL PIN US DOWN, JACK, ON WHERE
WE'RE SEEING THE BEST DATA.
ISRAEL IS A LITTLE AHEAD OF US.
I HATE TO SAY THAT BEING A PROUD
AMERICAN, BUT WE'RE SORT OF
WATCHING WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE
AND VERY QUICKLY WE WERE SEEING
EVEN AFTER JUST THE FIRST DOSE,
THEY STARTED OFF WITH THE PFIZER
VACCINE.
WE WERE SEEING 80% REDUCTION IN
THE NUMBER OF CASES AND NOW
WE'RE GETTING DATA AFTER THE
SECOND DOSE AND WE'RE SEEING
OVER 90%.
SO WE'RE SEEING REAL-WORLD DATA
DEMONSTRATING THE SAME,
TREMENDOUS LEVEL OF EFFICACY IN
THESE VACCINES.
WHEN YOU GET TO HOSPITALIZATIONS
AND DEATHS TREMENDOUSLY
EFFECTIVE TOOLS.
>> NOT THAT OFTEN IN LIFE THAT
YOU SEE THE ESTIMATES PLAYING
OUT BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD
ANTICIPATED ESPECIALLY GOING
WITH SOMETHING LIKE THIS WITH
THIS DISEASE.
LET ME ASK YOU OTHER QUESTIONS
ABOUT THE VACCINATION AND ABOUT
EFFECTIVENESS.
WHAT ARE WE LEARNING ABOUT HOW
LONG THIS EFFECTIVENESS CAN LAST
AFTER YOU'VE RECEIVED YOUR
APPROPRIATE VACCINE?
>> YEAH.
I THINK THIS IS KEY.
EVERYONE WANTS TO KNOW, IF I GET
MY VACCINE HOW LONG WILL THIS
PROTECTION LAST?
AND IT'S BEEN A GREAT TIME FOR
INFECTIOUS DISEASE PHYSICIANS
BECAUSE SUDDENLY EVERYONE IS
EDUCATED.
THEY WANT TO ASK THESE QUESTIONS
AND BEFORE THEY CAME IN AND GOT
WHATEVER SHOT.
THANK YOU.
AND MAYBE THEY LEFT WITH A CARD
TELLING THEM WHEN TO COME BACK
AND NOW THERE'S CURIOSITY HERE
AND THEY'RE STARTING TO GET THE
DATA AND THE DATA IS EVOLVING
AND IT RECENTLY EVOLVED IN FRONT
OF US WHICH IS GREAT.
THE INITIAL DATA, SOLID DATA ON
THE EARLY ROLLED OUT VACCINES
AND THAT WOULD BE THE PFIZER AND
MODERNA THAT WE HAD THREE MONTHS
OF GOOD PROTECTION.
WE ARE NOW SEEING, ACTUALLY
THAT'S SIX MONTHS AND I HAVE TO
SAY WHEN WE LOOK AT THE LEVELS
OF PROTECTION AND WE LOOK AT
LEVELS OF ANTIBODIES, IT LOOKS
LIKE THAT TRAJECTORY WILL
SUGGEST AT LEAST A YEAR OF
PROTECTION, BUT I'M GOING TO
THROW IN A CAVEAT THERE BECAUSE
THE VIRUS IS CHANGING.
SO WHEN I SAY A YEAR I'M TALKING
A YEAR FROM THE ORIGINAL VIRUS
THAT CAME OUT OF WUHAN.
WE'RE LOOKING AT PROBABLY
THROWING A BOOSTER, A
QUADRIVALENT BOOSTER PROBABLY
EARLY THIS FALL.
IT MAY BE THAT THIS IS A YEARLY
SHOT.
THAT'S THE PESSIMISM.
THE OPTIMISM IS WE'LL HAVE AT
LEAST A YEAR PROTECTION FROM
THIS SHOT.
THIS MAY BE A YEARLY THING OR
MAYBE LESS FREQUENT.
>> EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THE
SCIENTISTS MEAN WHEN YOU SAY A
BOOSTER SHOT.
IS IT JUST ANOTHER SHOT?
ANOTHER ONE OF THE ONES THAT
YOU'VE GOTTEN OR WILL IT BE
MODIFIED IN SOME FASHION?
>> THAT'S AN EXCELLENT QUESTION.
I WAS JUST ON A CONFERENCE CALL
IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY AND
SOMEONE SAID DO WE HAVE
BOOSTERS?
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BOOSTER?
IT'S EITHER THE SAME SHOT YOU
GOT BEFORE, JUST BOOSTING YOU
BACK UP AGAIN OR THAT BOOSTER
CAN BE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.
IT CAN HAVE MODIFICATIONS TO
KEEP UP WITH CHANGES THAT THE
VIRUS MIGHT HAVE.
WHEN YOU SAY BOOSTER, TIME WILL
TELL WHETHER THAT'S THE SAME
QUADRIVALENT, SHOT, YEAR AFTER
YEAR OR WHETHER OR NOT THAT
SHOT, MUCH LIKE THE FLU SHOT WOO
WILL BE AN UPDATED BOOSTER THIS
YEAR.
WE ASKED ABOUT THE ASTRAZENECA
VACCINE BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW
THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CONCERNS
EXPRESSED IN EUROPE.
THERE WERE SUGGESTIONSOR AT
LEAST CONCERNS THAT INSTANCES OF
BLOOD CLOTS MIGHT HAVE BEEN
ASSOCIATED IN SOME FASHION WITH
THE ASTRAZENECA VACCINE WHAT
I'VE SEEN WERE 30 OR 40
INSTANCES OF BLOOD CLOTS IN
PERHAPS 15 MILLION, MAYBE MORE
VACCINATIONS.
SO NOT STAGGERING NUMBERS, BUT
WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT
ANY NUMBERS.
WHERE DO YOU SEE THE ASTRAZENECA
VACCINE RIGHT NOW AND DOES IT
APPEAR THAT ULTIMATELY A
DECISION WILL BE MADE AND THAT
IT IS, INDEED, SAFE ENOUGH TO
CONTINUE ITS USE.
>> YEAH.
THE ASTRAZENECA VACCINE IS A
LITTLE TOUGH, TO BE HONEST.
IT'S SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM THE
OTHER VACCINES.
THE WAY THE VACCINES WORK IS WE
ARE EDUCATING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
ABOUT THE SPIKE PROTEIN WHICH IS
WHAT SARS COVID II, THE VIRUS
THAT GIVES US COVID-19 WILL
AFFECT OURSELVES OR IT CAN HAVE
A NICE, ROBUST RESPONSE AND WHAT
PEOPLE LEARNED A WHILE AGO IS
THAT IT CAN CHANGE ITS SHAPE AND
CONFIRMATION ASK ALL OF THE
OTHER VACCINATION STRATEGIES ARE
BASED UPON STABILIZING IT IN
THIS PRE-FUSION STATE, WE CALL
IT.
ASTRAZENECA SAID WE CAN PROBABLY
THROW IT IN AND NOT DO THAT.
SO THERE IS A SUBTLE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN ASTRAZENECA AND OTHER
PLATFORMS AND THERE'S BEEN A
COUPLE OF BUMPS IN THE ROAD FOR
ASTRAZENECA.
FIRST, EARLY ON WITH THE ISSUE
WHERE THEY HAD A MANUFACTURING
CHALLENGE AND PEOPLE WERE
GETTING HALF THE DOSES AND WE
DIDN'T HEAR ABOUT IT UNTIL LATER
AND THE SIDE EFFECTS THAT WERE
LEAKED OUT OF BOARD MEETINGS AND
PROPERLY ANNOUNCED, MAYBE AS WE
LOOK BACK ON IT AND NOW THE
LATEST BUMP IN THE ROAD HAS BEEN
THIS BLOOD CLOTTING ISSUE.
A FEW MORE, AND WE'RE TALKING
ABOUT AN EASILY TREATABLE
COMPLICATION WITH AN INCIDENT
THAT WE'RE SEEING IS A ONE IN A
MILLION VERSUS WE LOOK AT COVID
WHERE YOUR CHANCES OF DYING ARE
ONE OR TWO IN A HUNDRED.
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE BALANCED
ISSUES WHERE YOU SAY THE
PREPONDERANCE OF SCIENTIFIC
EVIDENCE DURING A PANDEMIC
FAVOR, YOU KNOW, USING ALL OF
THE TOOLS WE HAVE.
AND IN A ONE IN A MILLION CHANCE
OF GETTING A BLOOD CLOT VERSUS A
ONE IN A HUNDRED CHANCE OF DYING
YOU CAN DO THOSE NUMBERS AND SAY
THERE IS A PLACE FOR THIS
VACCINE AT THIS POINT OF THE
PANDEMIC.
AS WE MOVE FORWARD WE MAY WANT
TO REASSESS THAT ISSUE.
>> WE TALKED ABOUT ASTRAZENECA
BEING USED IN OTHER PARTS OF THE
WORLD.
IS THERE ANTICIPATION THAT IT
WOULD ALSO BE UTILIZED HERE IN
THE UNITED STATES?
>> RIGHT NOW ASTRAZENECA IS NOT
APPROVED FOR USE IN THE U.S.,
BUT THEY ARE INTERESTED IN
GETTING APPROVAL.
TOO MANY ISSUES WITH THE
MANUFACTURING PLANT THAT WAS
MAKING BOTH J&J, AND THE
ASTRAZENECA.
THE PROBLEM WITH DOING THAT,
RIGHT, IS THEY MIXED THE
INGREDIENTS OF THE TWO AND THE
TURNAROUND WAS LET'S JUST MAKE
J&J, IN THAT FACTORY BECAUSE
THAT'S WHAT'S APPROVED HERE.
IT WILL BE INTERESTING GOING
FORWARD.
WE HAVE ENOUGH VACCINES WITH THE
MODERNA, PFIZER AND J&J, FOR THE
ENTIRE U.S. POPULATION.
MORE THAN ENOUGH PARTICULARLY
BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE
THAT MAY CHOOSE NOT TO GET
VACCINATED.
SO IT'S NOT CLEAR TO ME THAT WE
NEED ASTRAZENECA HERE IN THE
UNITED STATES.
ASTRAZENECA IS ALSO UNLIKE THE
RNA VACCINES, SOMETHING THAT
DOESN'T REQUIRE TO BE FROZEN OR
THERMAL SHIPPERS.
ASTRAZENECA MAY PLAY MORE OF A
ROLE THAN THE U.S.
>> THAT IS WE'VE HEARD THE TERM
COVID LONG HAULERS, PEOPLE WHO
APPEAR TO BE RECOVERING AND
PERHAPS FOR A LONG PERIOD OF
TIME, EXPERIENCING SYMPTOMS.
YOU'VE BEEN ACTIVELY INVOLVED?
'S A SUGGESTION THAT THE
ADMINISTRATION MIGHT PROVIDE
SOME HELP FOR THE COVID LONG
HAULERS.
>> COULD BE ONE OF THE FEW,
OPTIMISTIC BEING -- THERE WAS
THIS OLDZ?
DOES MAKING SURE THEY WERE NOT
IN THE HOSPITAL AND THEY STARTED
GREAT FALL LOW UP.
FOR A LARGE NUMBER OF
INDIVIDUALS THIS IS NOT JUST A
TWO-WEEK ILL HAPPENS AND WE'RE
HEARING NUMBERS AND IT SEEMS TO
BE CONSISTENT.
20% TO 30% OF ADULTS WHO GET
COVID MAY CONTINUE TO SUFFER
MONTHS AFTER WARD AND THIS HAS
BEEN DEVASTATING.
IN A SENSE, THERE ARE TWO TYPES
OF PATIENTS AND THERE ARE
PATIENTS THAT HAVE HAD SUCH
SEVERE COVID THAT THEIR LUNGS
ARE SCARRED AND THERE'S
PERMANENT DAMAGE TO THEIR HEART.
THOSE PEOPLE ARE NOT SEEING THE
BENEFITS OF THE VACCINE BECAUSE
THERE'S A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF
SCARRING AND DAMAGE THAT IS NOT
REVERSIBLE, BUT 80%, 90% OF
PEOPLE DON'T END UP IN THE
HOSPITAL, BUT YET THEY HAVE
DEBILITATING NEUROLOGICAL
CHALLENGES AND THE BRAIN FOG.
THEY CAN'T WRITE THEIR OWN NAME
AND THEY HAVE TROUBLE COMPLETING
A SENTENCE AND THEY CAN'T RETURN
TO WORK AND ARE EXHAUSTED AND
HAVE TROUBLE GOING UP AND DOWN
THE STAIRS.
>> FOR THAT LARGER POPULATION,
WE'RE SEEING 30%, 40% OF THEM
ARE SEEING IMPROVED WITH
VACCINES.
SO NOT EVERYONE, BUT MY GOSH,
30%, 40% IF THIS PANS OUT FOR
THE LARGER STUDIES AND WE HAVE
ONE GOING.
AKIKO UP, AND LET'S GET A REAL
NUMBER AND LET'S GET A BUNCH OF
PEOPLE LONG COVID AND LET'S
REALLY FOLLOW THEM PROSPECTIVE
TO SEE WHAT IS THAT% AND WHAT IS
THAT CHARACTERISTIC AND WHICH
PATIENT IS LIKELY TO GET BETTER
AND THEN HOPEFULLY IT WILL GIVE
US INSIGHT INTO WHY ARE SO MANY
PEOPLE SUFFERING, SO IT IS NOT
JUST 30%, 40%, BUT WE CAN GET
60% OR BETTER, AS WELL.
>> SOME OPTIMISM HERE.
>> YES.
>> LET'S TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE
QUESTIONS PEOPLE HAVE AS THEY'RE
ABOUT TO RECEIVE THEIR VACCINES
OR IF THEY'RE HESITANT ABOUT IT
AND THIS MIGHT HELP THEM IN
TERMS OF SAYING, OKAY, I WILL GO
DO THIS RIGHT NOW.
IF IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO SAY
BEFORE BECAUSE THERE IS A BIT OF
A MISCONCEPTION THAT THESE
VACCINATIONS ARE NOT ESSENTIALLY
INJECTING THE VIRUS INTO YOU.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT?
>> SO IF SOMEONE SAYS I'M
THINKING ABOUT THE VACCINATION
OR I AM GETTING THE VACCINATION,
WHAT IS THE COMMON REACTION TO
EXPECT FROM THAT?
>> ONE OF THE THINGS ABOUT THESE
VACCINES WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN
THE FLU SHOT IS A SIGNIFICANT
NUMBER OF PEOPLE WILL SAY FOR A
DAY OR TWO AFTER THE VACCINE AND
THEY FEEL LIKE THEY'RE FIGHTING
SOMETHING OFF.
THEY FEEL SICK.
THEY'VE GOT THE MUSCLE ACHES AND
WE CERTAINLY SEE HEADACHES AND
FEVERS.
PEOPLE WHO HAD COVID BEFORE AND
GET VACCINATED IN GENERAL
THEY'RE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE
SYMPTOMS AND THE SECOND DOSE IF
WE'RE DOING A MODERNA OR PFIZER
APPROACH.
THE SECOND DOSE HAS A LITTLE BIT
MORE OF THOSE SIDE EFFECTS.
SO, YEAH, A LOT OF PEOPLE -- I
WOULD HAVE TO SAY FRIDAYS ARE A
POPULAR DAY FOR PEOPLE TO GET
VACCINATED AND I GUESS IF YOU
DON'T LIKE YOUR JOB, MONDAY
WOULD BE A BETTER CHOICE TO GET
A DAY OR TWO OFF.
>> NO, THAT'S MOSTLY WHAT WE'RE
SEEING AND THERE WAS A LOT OF
CONCERN EARLY ON ABOUT THIS
ANAPHYLAXIS AND IT'S NOT AS HIGH
A LEVEL AS WE WERE CONCERNED IT
WOULD BE.
>> ONCE AGAIN, WE ARE TALKING
WITH AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE
SPECIALIST AT COLUMBIA
UNIVERSITY HEAD OF INFECTIOUS
DISEASE AT PRO HEALTH NEW YORK.
MY WIFE AND I HAD BOTH OF OUR
SHOTS AND NEITHER OF US HAD REAL
PROBLEMS AT ALL AFTERWARDS.
I, AFTER THE SECOND ONE, HAD A
MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT SLIGHT, VERY
DULL HEADACHE THAT BASICALLY
DIDN'T WAKE ME UP AND WAS GONE
BY MORNING.
SO ANECDOTALLY WHEN PEOPLE ASK
ME, WE'RE FINE.
LISTEN TO THE EXPERTS SUCH AS
YOU AND GO AHEAD AND DO IT.
>> HERE'S A QUESTION FOR YOU
THAT I'VE HEARD PEOPLE SAY,
SHOULD I BE TAKING SOME SORT OF
PAIN RELIEVER EITHER BEFORE MY
VACCINATION OR AFTER MY
VACCINATION?
WHAT'S THE ANSWER TO THAT?
>> YEAH.
I THINK YOUR EXPERIENCE IS VERY
TELLING, JACK.
MOST PEOPLE WHO GET THE VACCINE
ACTUALLY FEEL FINE.
I JOKE THAT, LIKE, I HAD A FEW
MINUTES OF FEELING FRUSTRATED
AFTER MY SECOND SHOT, BUT THAT
WAS AFTER I OPENED AN E-MAIL
FROM ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES.
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE FEEL
ABSOLUTELY FINE.
SO THERE'S NO REASON TO
PREEMPTIVELY MEDICATE AND
THERE'S THOUGHT THAT IT GIVES
YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM A CHANCE TO
BE EDUCATED SO YOU DON'T GO GET
THE VACCINE PRE-MEDICATED.
>> SO IF YOU GO THE NEXT DAY AND
YOU FEEL CRUMBY, THESE ARE
ROBUST VACCINES AND IT'S FINE TO
TAKE TYLENOL OR IBUPROFEN EARLY
AND IT'S FINE TO TAKE SOMETHING
TO TREAT THOSE SYMPTOMS.
IF THERE'S MINIMAL IMPACT, IT'S
EXACTLY THAT.
JUST MINIMAL.
IN THE TRIALS PEOPLE TOOK THESE
MEDICATIONS AND WE SAW AS
PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED INCREDIBLY
ROBUST EFFICACY.
>> WE TALKED BEFORE ABOUT WHAT
WE ARE LEARNING ABOUT HOW LONG
THE PROTECTION CAN BE LASTING
HERE AFTERWARDS.
ANOTHER QUESTION WE HEAR RAISED
OFTEN IS ONCE YOU HAVE RECEIVED
YOUR -- ALL OF YOUR DOSES OF
YOUR VACCINATION AND THE TWO
WEEKS OR SO AFTER THE SECOND ONE
HAS GONE BY ONE OF THE QUESTIONS
PEOPLE ASKING IS CAN YOU THEN
TRANSMIT -- CAN YOU TRANSMIT THE
VIRUS TO SOMEBODY ELSE AND HOW
CONCERNED SHOULD YOU BE AT THAT
POINT THAT YOU CAN, ONCE AGAIN,
CONTRACT IT?
SO I'M GOING TO TURN THIS INTO
THREE QUESTIONS, JACK AND NOT
ONLY THE ANSWERS TO THE
QUESTIONS.
THE FIRST ONE AND YOU HIT THIS
PERFECTLY, THE VACCINE DOESN'T
TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
WE, UNFORTUNATELY, I'M ON A
NATIONAL VACCINE COMMITTEE FOR
UNITED HEALTH GROUP AND WE WERE
HAVING A CONVERSATION WHERE
THERE IS AN UPTICK IN INFECTIONS
FIVE OR SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE
FIRST SHOT SO YOU ARE NOT
PROTECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE
FIRST SHOT.
SO DON'T GO OUT AND CELEBRATE
YET.
THAT FIRST SHOT IN SOME CASES,
THE MODERNA AND PFIZER IS
FOLLOWED BY A SECOND SHOT.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO WEEKS
AFTER THAT SECOND SHOT.
J&J, TWO WEEKS AFTER THE FIRST
SHOT WHERE WE START TO SEE THE
PROTECTION THAT WE TALK ABOUT?
>> THAT'S THE FIRST THING.
YOU'VE GOT TO WAIT AND DESPITE
HOW EXCITED YOU ARE, YOU JUST
GOT THAT VACCINE AND YOU'RE NOT
PROTECTED YET, BUT HOW PROTECTED
ARE YOU FROM THOSE TWO DIFFERENT
ISSUES?
HOW LIKELY ARE YOU AFTER THE
VACCINE TO GET A LEVEL OF
INFECTION THAT MAY NOT EVEN BE
APPARENT TO YOU, BUT MIGHT ALLOW
YOU TO TRANSMIT TO OTHERS?
AND WE'RE SEEING MORE ASK MORE
DATA SAYING THAT THAT IS
SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED.
IT IS NOT ZERO AND WE SAW PRETTY
IMPRESSIVE RESULTS WHERE WE WERE
100% NOT EVEN GETTING INFECTED
AND MAYBE THERE'S AN 80% OR 90%
REDUCTION IN THE CHANCE OF
GETTING INFECTED AT ALL.
NOT ALL THESE INFECTIONS ARE YOU
AWARE OF, BUT IF THAT VIRUS IS
THERE, THERE IS A CHANCE THAT
YOU CAN SPREAD TO OTHERS AND IT
IS DECREASED AND WE THINK THE
LEVEL OF VIRUS SHOULD YOU GET
EXPOSE SIDE LEVEL, AS WELL SO WE
THINK THAT THE VACCINES HAVE A
BIG IMPACT ON INTERRUPTING
TRANSMISSION AND INTERRUPTING
YOUR ABILITY TO SPREAD IT, BUT
IT'S NOT 100% SO THAT'S CRITICAL
TO KNOW.
THE SECOND IS ONCE YOU GET
VACCINATED PEOPLE TALK ABOUT
THIS BREAKTHROUGH.
CAN A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN
VACCINATED STILL ACTUALLY GET
INFECTED AND STILL ACTUALLY GET
QUITE SICK?
IN THE TRIALS WE WERE LOOKING AT
HEALTHIER INDIVIDUALS AND PEOPLE
NOT ON SPECIFIC MEDICATIONS AND
IN REAL WORLD EXPERIENCES IF YOU
GIVE THIS VACCINE TO A
GENTLEMAN, SAY, IN THEIR 90s WHO
IS ON A NUMBER OF MEDICATIONS
AND DOESN'T HAVE A FULLY INTACT
IMMUNE SYSTEM THAT INDIVIDUAL
MAY GET SOME DEGREE OF
PROTECTION, BUT THEY'RE NOT
GOING TO BE 100% PROTECTED AND
THAT'S WHY WE STILL TALK ABOUT
PEOPLE TAKING PRECAUTIONS.
WHEN YOU'RE LIVING IN A CASE
LIKE NASSAU COUNTY IN LONG
ISLAND WHERE THERE IS A 95
POSITIVITY RATE, JUST BECAUSE
YOU HAVE YOUR VACCINE DOESN'T
MEAN YOU GET TO TAKE YOUR MASK
OFF YET AND MAYBE IN JULY WHEN
THERE'S NOT A LOT OF VIRUS IN
THE COMMUNITY AND YOU'VE BEEN
VACCINATED AND ALL YOUR FRIENDS
HAVE BEEN VACCINATED AND THEN WE
START CHANGING THE GUIDANCE, BUT
RIGHT NOW WE'RE STILL IN A P
PANDEMIC.
WE STILL HAVE 50,000, 60,000
CASES PER DAY AND HIGH
POSITIVITY RATES AND WE STILL
HAVE HOSPITALS WITH A LOT OF
CAPACITY CHALLENGES.
SO NOT QUITE TIME TO TAKE OFF
THE MASKS AND HAVE THOSE BIG
MASKLESS INDOOR CELEBRATIONS.
>> HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET THERE.
YOU MENTIONED ADOLESCENTS.
LET ME ASK WHERE WE ARE RIGHT
NOW IN TERMS OF VACCINES FOR
YOUNGER CHILDREN.
>> THIS IS, I THINK, HUGE.
WE HAVE A CHUNK OF OUR
POPULATION UNDER THE AGE OF 18,
UNDER THE AGE OF 16.
SO UNTIL WE CAN START OFFERING
THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET
VACCINATED TO THAT GROUP, WE
HAVE A LARGE ENOUGH POPULATION
THAT ANY SORT OF IDEA OF HERD
IMMUNITY IS DEAD IN ITS TRACKS.
WE JUST GOT REALLY EXCITING NEWS
FROM PFIZER THAT THEY COMPLETED
THEIR STUDY LOOKING AT 12, 13,
14, 15-YEAR-OLDS AND 100%
EFFICACY AND THIS WASN'T JUST IS
IMTOM ATTIC AND THEY WERE DOING
PCR TESTING AND NONE OF THE KIDS
WERE INFECTED WHERE IT WAS 28 IN
THE GROUP THAT DID NOT GET THE
VACCINE.
SO THEY'RE PUSHING FOR EXPANSION
DOWN TO 12 AND ALL THE PFIZER
AND MODERNA AND J&J, THEY'RE ALL
LOOKING AT POTENTIALLY THE
ABILITY TO GO DOWN TO SIX MONTHS
OF AGE.
I'LL SAY THE J&J, PLATFORM HAS
BEEN USED FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS
IN AFRICA.
IT WAS PART OF HOW WE LEFT THE
LAST EBOLA OUTBREAK AND THAT WAS
USED IN PREGNANT WOMEN.
IT WAS USED IN NURSING MOTHERS
AND IN KIDS DOWN TO 4 MONTHS OF
AGE.
THERE'S NO SIGN TO SUGGEST
THERE'S ANY CONCERN, BUT WE'RE
ROLLING THIS OUT AND GETTING ALL
OF THE SAFETY DATA BECAUSE
PEOPLE WANT TON BEFORE THEY GIVE
THIS TO THEIR CHILD, WHAT'S THE
TRACK RECORD?
WHAT'S THE SCIENCE?
>> LET ME ASK YOU GO THE IDEA OF
A SEX TASK FORCE.
HOW OBSESSIVE DO YOU THINK THAT
ONE AND HOW EFFECTIVE WOULD IT
BE?
>> I WAS ON A CALL WITH THE
UNITED HEALTH GROUP HIGH-LEVEL
DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS AND, AND
MY COMMENT IS I THINK WE'RE
PREMATURE HERE.
WE STARTED OFF WITH THE NUMBERS
AND A THIRD OF NEW YORKERS HAVE
HAD AT LEAST ONE SHOT WHICH IS
70%.
MOST NEW YORKERS HAVE NOT HAD AN
OPPORTUNITY TO GET A VACCINE YET
SO WE KNOW THAT THE PEOPLE
HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET
THE VACCINES ARE NOT THE SAME
DEMOGRAPHICS HARDEST HIT BY THIS
VIRUS AND THE FIRST STEP IS TO
MAKE SURE EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO
THE VACCINE SO WE'RE NOT GIVING
PRIVILEGES ON TOP OF PEOPLE WO
HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF GETTING
THE VACCINE EARLY, BUT THERE IS
A POINT WHEN WE WANT TO HAVE
FULL, IN-PERSON SPORTING VENUES.
WE WANT TO GO SEE MOVIES AND OUT
TO RESTAURANTS AND PEOPLE WILL
PREFER, IF THEY CAN GO TO VENUES
WHERE A VACCINATED PERSON NEXT
TO THEM IS LESS LIKELY TO GET
THEM INFECTED, PARTICULARLY
OLDER INDIVIDUALS WHO MAY NOT
HAVE THE SAME, ROBUST IMMUNE
SYSTEM AS THE REST OF US.
I THINK THE WHOLE VACCINE
PASSPORT THING WILL PLAY OUT IN
SOME SHAPE OR FORM.
WE'VE USED VACCINATION PASSPORTS
IN MUCH OF THE WORLD WITH YELLOW
FEVER.
THIS IS NOT AN OLD IDEA.
A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE SORT OF,
WHERE IS THIS COMING FROM?
IF YOU'RE A COUNTRY THAT NO
LONGER HAS YELLOW FEVER, YOU
DON'T WANT PEOPLE COMING IN WHO
HAVEN'T BEEN VACCINATED.
IF WE CAN REACH A POINT WHERE
WE'VE HAD OUR COUNTRY WITH A LOW
LEVEL OR MAYBE WE CAN GET TO A
GREAT LOW LEVEL OF COVID WE'RE
NOT GOING TO WANT PEOPLE COMING
IN WHO ARE NOT TAKING ALL OF THE
STEPS TO KEEP IT AT THAT LEVEL
AND IT MAY EVEN GO DOWN TO A
STATE OR VENUE LEVEL.
SO THIS WILL BE CHALLENGING AND
THERE IS A LOT OF HEALTH EQUITY
AND ETHICAL ISSUES SURROUNDING
THIS, BUT THERE IS A CERTAIN
INEVITABILITY TO DOING THIS.
>> LAST QUESTION.
WE HAVE BEEN BESIEGED BY THIS,
NOT JUST IN THE U.S., BUT AROUND
THE WORLD.
GIVEN WHAT WE ARE SEEING NOW,
HOW OPTIMISTIC NOW, AND HOW
OPTIMISTIC SHOULD WE BE THAT WE
ARE GETTING CLOSE TO DEALING
WITH THIS SENSE OF SOME
NORMALCY.
>> I WILL SAY IT IS OKAY TO BE
OPTIMISTIC.
WE'RE STARTING WITH THE TOOLS
THAT WILL END THIS PANDEMIC HERE
IN THE U.S. AND ULTIMATELY
THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
WE ARE AVERAGING OVER 3 MILLION
VACCINATIONS A DAY.
THIS IS HUGE.
THE VACCINE HAS A LOT OF TROUBLE
DOING MUCH IN THE PERSON THAT'S
BEEN VACCINATED.
AS THE PRODUCTION RAMPS UP AND
AS WE EXTEND INTO THE YOUNGER
AGES, I THINK WE CAN BE
OPTIMISTIC AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
ARE IN THE FOURTH WAVE AND A
BUMP, AND WE STILL HAVE TO BE
CAREFUL ABOUT THE CONCERNS AND
NO, THERE IS REASON TO BE
OPTIMISTIC.
>> THAT'S CERTAINLY GOOD TO
HEAR.
>> AS I SAID BEFORE WHEN I DID
THE INTRODUCTION HERE,
INTRODUCING YOU SAYING YOU WILL
BE ABLE TO ANSWER MANY OF THE
QUESTIONS THAT SO MANY OF US
HAVE AND YOU'VE DONE A MARVELOUS
JOB OF DOING THAT, THANK YOU.
IT IS UNCERTAIN AS UNCERTAINTY
CAN WEIGH HEAVY ON PEOPLE AND
HAVING ANSWERS, ONCE AGAIN, DR.
DANIEL GRIFFIN, INFECTIOUS
DISEASE EXPERT.
THANK YOU FOR SHARING YOUR
THOUGHTS AND UNDERSTAND AND IF
NOTHING ELSE IT HELPS ME FEEL
BETTER AFTER THE CONVERSATION,
AND I LOOK FORWARD TO TALKING TO
YOU DOWN THE ROAD.
THANKS VERY MUCH.
YOU TAKE CARE.
>> THANK YOU.
♪
♪
>>> "METROFOCUS" IS MADE
POSSIBLE BY SUE AND EDGAR
WACHENHEIM III.
SILVIA A. AND SIMON ENDOWMENT TO
FIGHT ANTI-SEMITISM.
THE PETER G. PETERSON AND JOAN
SOONY FUND.
BERNARD AND BERNICE SCHWARTZ.
BARBARA ZUCKERBERG AND THE
AMBROSE FOUNDATION AND BY JANET
PRINDEL SIDLER AND JODY ARNHOLD,
JUDY AND JOSH WESTIN.
DR. ROBERT C. AND TINA SLOAN
FOUNDATION.
♪
♪
♪
♪
♪